At this week’s On Science Blogs, Tabitha M. Powledge collects bloggers’ analyses of the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby case, and what she finds is–a bit of a mess.
The FDA, for example, is still requiring labels on morning-after pills and IUDs saying these methods “may prevent implantation,” when the scientific consensus seems to be that they do not.
She finds a few bloggers who addressed a question I had: How will the decision affect health care more broadly? Will we now see all kinds of exceptions?
And there’s more. See On Science Blogs for details.
-Paul Raeburn
Leave a Reply