Skip to Content

Category: climate sceptics

  Richard A. Muller of UC Berkeley is an engaging, smart, and maverick physicist who has spent a good part of his career chewing on off-beat but not crazy hypotheses until they either fall apart or gain some credibility. He is good at being realistic about those that don't hold up or stall for lack of more...

  Richard A. Muller of UC Berkeley is an engaging, smart, and maverick physicist who has spent a good part of his career chewing on off-beat but not crazy hypotheses until they either fall apart or gain some credibility. He is good at being realistic about those that don't hold up or stall for lack of more data (his hunch never caught on that a distant solar companion, a brown dwarf named Nemesis, occasionally sprays comets into the inner solar system). Perhaps by nature he looked fishy-eyed at global warming science until he took a hard look for himself. Two tempting ways to judge his latest analysis of climate change data are 1) Wow, if even a  skeptic of the mainstream's consensus that climate change has us ankle deep in offal with knee- and hip-deep in sight can change his mind, that's a triumph for scientific method and maybe a politically effective tide-turner or, 2) He's a scientist. He had not paid much attention to global warming before. He and...

England's...

England's Prince Charles yesterday blasted, rapped, criticised, and otherwise took to task the UK's (and world's) ranks of climate change contrarians, skeptics, sceptics, deniers, and rejectionists or whatever you want to call those who think the IPCC has been hoodwinked or is part of a conspiracy or is just thick.

These remarks, at a European Union meeting in Brussells, unavoidably generated some press. His words of encouragement for the main bloc of scientists are no doubt welcome among them. They might also be more weighty if he were not also a stout advocate for homeopathic medicine. Oh well. Desperate circumstances are not a wise time to fine-toothed-comb one's allies for...