Skip to Content
7Jan 2013

Telegraph: China to lead world to long-pondered thorium-based, abundant, meltdown-proof nuclear power stations?

Telegraph: China to lead world to long-pondered  thorium-based, abundant, meltdown-proof nuclear power stations?

 Here's a beguiling headline and story that just ran in the UK:

A constant since the dawn of the nuclear age has been speculation - backed by experiments - that there are other ways to harness the atom for electricity than with the standard uranium  fission reactors that bring with them such headaches as waste disposal, security risks including possible conversion of their related hardware to weapons production, and the possibility of meltdowns such as those seen since at Chernobyl and Fukushima. Breeder reactors that would get more of the latent energy from the original uranium, fast neutron and high temperature units that could consume most of their high energy waste in their cores and leave less of an atomic garbage dump problem, and so on. Always on the list, if not at the top, has been a fuel cycle that looks great on paper, and relies on thorium-232. It is abundant, can't go into runaway chain reaction, makes its fuel on the spot (bombardment with neutrons turns it into a fissile isotope of uranium), and would generate little long-lived radioactive waste.

   Nifty. Also expensive and complicated. But in principle it has been proven as possible in nuclear labs around the world.

With that in mind, there is a kernel of what looks like real news in the Telegraph's story - an enthusiasm high in the ranks of China's rulers to break free of nuclear business-as-usual. However the piece has a few holes in it, plus a bonus or two that look to be typos or simple errors in hearing what sources said. One in particular has proliferated in aggregator and blog sites in a vivid quote: it declares that these things are safe because "Fission dies the moment you switch off the photon beam." It's such a cool quote that a technoid site that appears to be a Wikipedia wannabe promptly picked it up and added it to its entry on Thorium Reactors.

   It stopped me cold. A photon beam! Like a flashlight or in Brit-speak a torch? Huh? How would that keep a thorium reactor going? The mind spun and went nowhere.

   The quote's cited source is one Professor Robert Cywinski of the U. of Huddersfield, an authority on neutron sources, including those using accelerators and the process called spallation. They aim intense proton beams at targets to spawn neutrons. At some risk, as I didn't actually call Dr. Cywinski, I declare he was misquoted and that this beam is no flashlight but a heavy-duty particle acclerator's output of protons. Whack that and a thorium reactor kept going on its diet of outside neutrons would, surely, go out.

   Aside from this somewhat understandable garble, the piece refers to a "pebble-back" reactor. That's new to me. Pebble bed, I get. The author is the newspaper's international business editor. For all the muddled moments in it, and despite the hyperbolic suggestion that China is "running away" from the rest of the world with thorium, he produced a story of some substance on a field that is making the news generally.  But surely an editor of some stature should have the sense to pause for a moment, after diving without much experience into such a technical arena after speaking it appears with a royal just back from China, might have run some of the geeky bits past a pertinent, uh, boffin.

   And if by chance there are photon beams running a vital stage in thorium reactors, and pebble-back units waiting in the wings, Mr. Evans-Pritchard has my deep and mortified apologies.

  Oh, one more thing. India has a very old and ambitious thorium reactor program as well and has been at it a lot longer with a larger budeget than has China. The Telegraph might have mentioned it. (Here's a fine IEEE Spectrum Q&A from a few years ago by Seema Singh with one of the leaders of that program.)

    Other recent thorium reactor stories:

Grist for the Mill: Energy from Thorium (a US-based advocacy organization) with its own report, from early 2011, on China's program  (and source of this post's illus).

 

 

 

   

 

   

   

   

 

  

Comments

If people want to hear more from a journalist and thorium enthusiast, we did a feature interview recently on Quirks & Quarks with Richard Martin, author of SuperFuelhttp://www.cbc.ca/quirks/episode/2012/09/15/september-15-2012/index.html#5

He makes the same point about China leaving the US far behind in the throium race.

Login or register to post comments